What the evidence says
Current NAD+ studies do not provide an injection-headache rate
A 2026 retrospective pilot reviewed four days of IV NAD+ or IV nicotinamide riboside in a commercial setting. Its introduction says clinicians and patients commonly report symptoms that include headache during IV NAD+, but the study’s observed all-participant NAD+ symptom cluster did not list headache. The six IV NAD+ participants instead reported abdominal cramping, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, increased heart rate, throat pain, congestion, and chest pressure during infusion. The study was tiny, nonrandomized, short, and connected to the commercial clinic company. It did not study patient-specific compounded subcutaneous NAD+ injection or establish headache incidence, onset, duration, severity, causation, prevention, or treatment.
- Do not turn background or anecdotal reports into a percentage, and do not add headache to the study’s observed six-person symptom cluster when the results did not list it there.
- A 2026 critical review found evidence for IV longevity therapies sparse, heterogeneous, and insufficient for evidence-based anti-aging practice; it does not validate headache protocols for compounded injections.
- Timing after treatment matters for assessment, but timing alone cannot prove causation or rule out migraine, dehydration, infection, head injury, medicine effects, blood-pressure problems, or another diagnosis.