What the evidence says
Current NAD+ studies do not provide an injection-fatigue rate
A 2026 retrospective commercial-clinic pilot followed six people receiving four days of IV NAD+ and six receiving IV nicotinamide riboside. The study included a validated fatigue questionnaire among several patient-reported measures, but it was tiny, nonrandomized, short, and not designed to estimate acute fatigue caused by patient-specific compounded injections. The all-participant symptom cluster reported during IV NAD+ included abdominal cramping, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, increased heart rate, throat discomfort, congestion, and chest pressure; fatigue was not listed in that cluster. A separate 2026 critical review concluded that evidence for IV longevity therapies remains sparse and heterogeneous.
- Do not turn an energy or longevity marketing claim into proof that fatigue must be an expected “healing,” “detox,” or cellular-repair response.
- The pilot cannot establish whether compounded subcutaneous NAD+ caused an individual episode, how long tiredness should last, or what treatment change is safe.
- Timing after treatment is useful to document, but timing alone cannot rule out sleep loss, infection, dehydration, medication effects, anemia, thyroid disease, glucose problems, pregnancy, or another condition.